I certainly can't claim to know what drove Leica's design decisions, but I can make a informed guess as to what drove the lack of compression options:
In the Leica M8 and M9, DNG compression is done by using a tone curve (somewhat like an sRGB tone curve) to reduce the data width from 14 bits to 8 bits. On the M9, the compression is almost always invisible, unless you do some extreme processing and then look really hard.
The usual problems with images that are level compressed is that they show banding. Some people think that the reason why M8 and M9 images don't show banding (except under extreme circumstances) is that the tone curve that Leica uses is super clever. Not so - it's a standard power-of-two curve. Actually, the main reason for the lack of banding is that the Bayer demosaicing operation that happens to the data after its been decompressed tends to smooth out any banding. What happens is that because you're interpolating pixels, the interpolated pixels tend to end up "between" the bands that resulted from the compression.
Now on the M Monochom, the crucial difference is that there's no demosaicing step. So no interpolation, and no smoothing. So you're immediately far more at risk of banding.
So, I'd guess Leica chose to remove the compression options in order to avoid banding in compressed images.
Add a comment