Mostly, I use this blog to write about photography related issues, but today I'm making an exception, and writing about email apps. Apologies to regular readers, but never fear, normal service will resumed soon.

Email is important to me. As a consultant and entrepreneur, I get a lot of email, and have to process it efficiently. If I didn't, I could easily spend a large proportion of my day just dealing with email. I might add, I don't actually like email. Given the choice, I'd abolish email, and move to a messaging-style system such as Slack or one of it's competitors. But given that 90% plus of the communicating that I do is "external", rather than to people that work with me regularly, that's not an option.

My way of processing email efficiently is "Inbox Zero". Inbox Zero is an approach to email management aimed at keeping your inbox empty -- or almost empty -- at all times. In essence, the idea is to immediately either delete, archive or respond to as many emails as you can. Those that you can't immediately respond to, you defer. So to the extent possible, for as many emails as possible, you only deal with them once, rather than leaving them in your inbox forever, to be opened and reopened.

Until a few days ago, I used Mailbox on both my iPad and desktop, despite the fact that the desktop app was notoriously buggy. Mailbox was originally a stand-alone startup, but was taken over by Dropbox in 2013. However, Dropbox has now decided to discontinue Mailbox, much to my horror and annoyance. So I am now faced with having to replace Mailbox.

The reason why Mailbox was great for me was that on the iPad you could swipe any email in your inbox, and depending on swipe direction and length, you could delete, archive, or postpone any email. So one swipe per email to Inbox Zero. Very efficient.

In order to find a new email app, I've been looking though quite a list of options. Mailbox's creation triggered a lot of activity in the field. Numbers of new email apps, all with subtly different approaches to handling email, emerged. This is my take on the apps that I've looked at. This is by no means a full review of each - some apps were clearly not suitable for me, and I abandoned them almost immediately, without more than perfunctory testing.

Mail Pilot

Mail Pilot, from Mindsense, was the first app that I looked at, and the one that I had the highest hopes for, because unlike pretty much all the other apps on my list, Mindsense has apps for both iOS and OS X. Also, it has the option to defer emails, which is something that not all apps have. I chose to test (actually, I bought) the desktop version first, but was disappointed. It works reasonably well - certainly it's more reliable than Mailbox's desktop app ever was. But there were occasional problems syncing, and occasional strange behavior. But my real problem with Mail Pilot is that it's just ugly - the tool bar icons look like something from Windows 95. Really. Also, I found the user interface to be non-intuitive. So it's just not something I can see myself using regularly. I didn't test the iPad version; there's no free trial, and I had already lost faith that Mail Pilot was for me.

Zero

Zero also initially looked good. There's no Mac app, but when Mail Pilot fell by the wayside, it became clear to me that I probably wasn't going to find a multi-platform solution anyway. Zero ticked most of my boxes - a nice clean interface, and swipe to archive, etc. It doesn't have a true defer option, but does offer a scheme of prioritizing emails.

However, Zero proved to be very buggy. When new emails came in, the badge count incremented, but the new email didn't appear in the inbox. Huh?? Also, Zero doesn't have push notifications, even on GMail, where push is very easy. I contacted MailFeed, but they were unable to resolve the issue of the inbox not updating, other than suggesting that I do a manual update.

MailDeck

MailDeck, from Crono, is an interesting app. Unlike some of the other apps that I tried, it worked flawlessly, and supports turning emails into tasks. However, it has a few issues:
  • Firstly, the user interface is a bit unconventional. For example, the inbox uses a grid display. On an iPad, three columns are shown in landscape, and two in portrait, with a total of six emails displayed in summary form. But other apps with more conventional layouts, e.g., Mailbox, Outlook, etc, show summaries of six or seven emails and the full version of a selected email. 
  • No single swipe to action an email; you have to touch the action button, then touch what you want to do.
  • The display also uses lots of colors; it's not exactly in line with the "flat" iOS 9 design. 
  • Finally, while the app does support turning emails into tasks, the process is unintuitive, and doesn't have the simplicity of just deferring an email. 
The full unrestricted app is $19.99, which seems a lot given the competition. But if the interface and the task functionality appeal to you, this is a workable option. If you're planning on trying the free version, note that it has some really obtrusive "Upgrade now" advertising built in.

Spark

Spark, from Readdle, comes with a major recommendation: Apple has picked Spark as the “Best of the App Store 2015”! It also ticks most of my boxes. However, there's a huge problem - Spark doesn't support the iPad. It will run, but with iPhone screen resolution. So not an option for me - I do a lot of emailing on my iPad.

Inbox

Google's Inbox app is well known, and it's a very serious contender. As well as being specifically designed to facilitate Inbox Zero, it has a whole list of smart features that no other email app provides, such as check-in for flights, shipping information for purchases, etc. It also integrates fully with Gmail accounts, handles appointments well, etc. And is very reliable. If I had to, I could live with Inbox. But for me, Inbox also has some less than ideal features:
  • No unified inbox. Apparently the Android version does have a unified inbox, but not the iOS version. That may change soon, but for the moment, this is a deal killer for me.
  • Strange iPad user interface. Inbox's user interface on the iPhone is fine, but on the iPad has huge amounts of wasted space. It's as if Google built Inbox as a universal app, but only designed the display for the iPhone.
  • Inbox only supports Gmail accounts. Which is a bit of a problem if you have other accounts!

Boxer

Boxer, which comes with the tagline "A better inbox", is functionally the best Mailbox replacement that I have been able to find. The user interface isn't quite as clean and fluid as Mailbox, but Boxer has short and long swipes to either the left or right for emails in it's inbox, and each kind of swipe is customizable. So Boxer is one of the few email apps that fully delivers on Mailbox's "one swipe to action" paradigm. There's also a lot of other features to like:
  • Integrated scheduling. This is actually a big deal in many situations, one of the problems with Mailbox was that it didn't do scheduling. Boxer really does, which is great.
  • Connections to other services such as Evernote, Dropbox, Facebook, etc
  • The iOS version connects to Sanebox, which automatically categorizes your email, also very handy.
However, I did have reliability issues with Boxer. The contacts screen didn't always display my contacts. Strangely, when sending an email, my contacts appeared as autocomplete options, but Boxer's contacts screen was blank. I also had problems with Boxer not responding to changes in screen orientation on my iPad. Worse, technical support was non-existent. When I contacted Boxer about the problems, I received a automatic acknowledgement promising a response "as soon as possible", but that response never came. (Update - Boxer did eventually respond, but more than a week later. And the response didn't give a fix.)

CloudMagic

CloudMagic is a bit of an outlier on this list. It's hugely popular, but viewed as an app for InBox Zero, or as a Mailbox replacement, it really doesn't stack up. There's no swipe support, so actioning an email is a matter of two button presses. It does have support for deferring emails, but in a bit of a obscure way; you have to touch and hold on the star button. The default options for how long to defer are not really well thought out. If you get an email late at night, you might want to defer it till tomorrow morning, which is an option that than several other apps have. But CloudMagic's closest option to "tomorrow" is "24 hours", which is not ideal. So you have to manually set tomorrow 9am. But CloudMagic still deserves a look because of it's other features:
  • Most important, CloudMagic is beautiful. In fact, CloudMagic got a Webby for its visual design. Of the apps I tried, it's the only one with a better user interface than Mailbox. Most of the other apps, and Maildeck is the worst offender, have ugly toolbar icons and/or garish colors. CloudMagic has a clean, understated look, but still manages to work fluidly.
  • CloudMagic works with pretty much any email provider, including IMAP accounts.
  • CloudMagic's big party trick is integration with other web services. Rather than viewing itself as the one app that you're going to use for everything, CloudMagic seems to view itself as coordinating between email and other services. It uses the paradigm of "cards", that can be sent to services such as Salesforce, Evernote, Pocket, Zendesk, Trello, MailChimp, DropBox, etc, etc. 
I tried CloudMagic's integration with Trello, which I use for project management anyway, and it worked exactly as advertised, the CloudMagic card showing up on my selected Trello board. For some people, this is likely to a very useful integration, and may justify CloudMagic all on its own. In effect, you can use passing an email to Trello, or another supported service, as a "defer" option. The only problem with this is that you don't get the email back to reply to. In my case, I frequently need to reply to deferred emails, which makes the CloudMagic to Trello workflow less than perfect.

Outlook

Outlook, from Microsoft, might not be what some people expect to see on this list. Saying Microsoft Outlook tends to bring up the image of the solid but clunky app that Microsoft ships with Office. Outlook for mobile is a different product, with a much more streamlined interface. It does pretty much everything that you'd want from a mobile email client, including calendaring. Outlook also has good support for Inbox Zero, with email scheduling, and swipe options.

The only downside to Outlook is that the swipe options aren't very flexible. Firstly, there is only left and right swipe, not short and long swipe as well, so you can't swipe for all three of delete, archive and defer. You have to chose two. If you only ever archive emails rather than deleting some, that may not be a problem for you. Secondly, you can't do things such as configuring to delete and mark as read. So you end up with unread emails in your deleted folder, which can cause some other email clients to show unread emails in their badge count.

In use, Outlook was, at least for me, rock solid, with no signs of the kind of glitches that marred my experience with some other apps.

Conclusions

So what email app should you chose? Well, that depends:
  • If you only have a single Gmail account to worry about, then Inbox may be your best bet. It's got lots of convenience features that others just don't have.
  • If you're looking for the best Mailbox replacement, then Boxer is the obvious choice, if you can deal with occasional glitches, and no tech support. But the flexibility of Boxer's swipe options make it the best Mailbox replacement. And it does calendaring!
  • If you're not too worried about Inbox Zero, and the ability to conveniently defer emails, then CloudMagic is an intriguing choice. Certainly you should check out the list of available integrations, and see if  CloudMagic can help you out.
  • If you want something that is reliable, has full Inbox Zero functionality, and you don't mind swipe options that aren't quite as well thought out as some of the other apps, the Outlook may well be the way to go.
At the end of the day, I'll be going with Outlook. The various glitches I had with Boxer just don't seem worth the better swipe options. But I will be keeping a close eye on CloudMagic. If they ever implement swipe options similar to Mailbox, I'll be changing over.
0

Add a comment

  1. Good news in a difficult year - all the macOS apps that I support - AccuRaw EXR, AccuRaw Monochrome, pcdMagic, CornerFix, dcpTool (both the GUI and command line version), DNG cleaner and pcdtojpeg - now are all available with native Apple Silicon versions for blazing fast performance on Apple's new "M1" processor. Download are in all the usual places.

    Enjoy.

    0

    Add a comment

  2. There's a whole slew of new camera support, including for Canon's new CR3 format.

    Updates of AccuRaw EXR, AccuRaw Monochrome, PhotoRaw are now available on the Apple App Store. These updates add support for these new cameras: Canon EOS-1D X Mark III, Canon EOS 90D, Canon EOS M50, Canon EOS M6 Mark II, Canon EOS Rebel SL3 (EOS 250D), Canon EOS R, Canon EOS RP, Canon EOS R5, Canon EOS R6, Canon PowerShot G5 X Mark II, Fujifilm XF10, Fujifilm GFX 50R, Fujifilm GFX 100, Fujifilm X-100V, Fujifilm X-A7, Fujifilm X-Pro3, Fujifilm X-T30, Fujifilm X-T4, Fujifilm X-T200, Leica Q2, Leica SL2, Nikon Coolpix P950, Nikon Coolpix P1000, Nikon D780, Nikon Z 6, Nikon Z 7, Nikon Z50, Panasonic DC-G90, Panasonic DC-G100, Panasonic DC-G110, Panasonic Lumix DC-G95, Panasonic DC-LX100 M2, Panasonic DC-S1, Panasonic DC-S1R, Panasonic DC-S5, Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II, Olympus OM-D E-M1X, Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III, Olympus E-PL10, Olympus OM-D E-M5, Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV, Olympus TG-6, Pentax K1 II, Ricoh GR III, Sony DSC-RX100 VII, Sony A7 III (ILCE-7M3), Sony A7C (ILCE-7C), Sony A7R Mark IV (ILCE-7RM4), Sony A7S III (ILCE-7SM3), Sony a6100 (ILCE-6100), Sony a6400 (ILCE-6400), Sony a6600 (ILCE-6600),Sony HX99. 

    0

    Add a comment

  3. pcdMagic for Windows - the only currently available app that can convert Kodak Photo CD images with correct color and at full resolution - is now available on the Microsoft Windows Store.

    This great news for users:

    • The Windows Store version has a free trial mode that allows the app to be tested without any commitment.
    • The Windows store handles all updates automatically.
    • There's no need to keep track of license codes.
    The Windows store only supports the latest versions of Windows 10. However, for users of earlier versions of Windows, you can still purchase pcdMagic from the FastSpring webstore.
    2

    View comments

  4. As usual when new Leica cameras come out, I took a quick look inside a DNG from one of Leica's new Leica CL  cameras:

    1. The camera name shows as "LEICA CL"
    2. The image data is 14-bit. There is no compression used in the DNG I looked at. 
    3. The DNG version is 1.4, with a "backward version" of 1.3. There is a reason for this - DNG 1.3 allows for opcodes, which Leica use for lens correction.
    4. In the DNG I looked at, which was shot with a "Summicron TL 1:2 23 ASPH." lens, lens correction is done by a single "WarpRectilinear" operation in the DNG. 
    5. In addition to the lens correction op code, there is also a "FixBadPixelsConstant" opcode, whose function is exactly as the name states. This is the same as in the Leica Q, SL, etc.
    6. Unusually, the DNGs all contain 2 different JPEG preview images in addition to the main raw image, one of 1620x1080, and finally a full sized preview of 6000x4000. Having the full sized preview is particularly odd, as it takes up a lot of space. In the approximately 45 MB files I've seen, the full size preview typically takes up about 1.8 MB. 
    So in summary, the DNGs appear to be a bit of a hybrid of the "SL", "Q", etc style of DNG, with a single lens correction opcode, and a bad pixels correction opcode, and of the "M10" style of DNG, with a full sized preview. As I noted in my analysis of the M10 DNG, the full size preview is probably there to support viewing on mobile devices that often don't have raw decoding capability built in. 

    Finally, it's notable that the DNGs don't contain the bizarre Lightroom XMP metadata that the M10 DNGs have embedded in them. 
    2

    View comments

  5. So finally, after many years of searching, I have an answer to the question that torments all who go down the digital color rabbit hole.

    This is from XKCD, brought to my attention via an article on the Digital Transitions website about the Phase One IQ3 100mp Trichromatic.



    0

    Add a comment

  6. Back in January, when the new Leica M10 was introduced, there were claims that the improvement in dynamic range from the Leica M240 to the M10 was of the order of 1.5 to 2 stops.  At the time, I wrote that just by eyeballing the published images, I believed the improvement to be "closer to 0.5 stops than 1.5-2".

    Much to my surprise, given what I had thought to be just a basic explanation of why dynamic range is a tricky concept, the post generated a lot of push-back. And I mean a LOT.

    Well, now there is actually an independent third-party measurement available, from photonstophotos.net:


    And....(drum roll)....the improvement in DR between the M240 and the M10 is 0.55 stops. As I predicted back in January.

    You can a find whole lot more information, including a useful interactive graphing tool that allows you to compare cameras, on the photonstophotos.net site.
    0

    Add a comment

  7. dcpTool has been available for quite a while as a command line application for Windows and the Mac. But now it available in the form of an easy to use Mac app, with powerful batch processing capabilities. dcpTool for the Mac is available from the App Store.

    dcpTool allows you to:

    1. Decompile DNG Camera Profile (DCP) files in XML. The XML can then be read and edited with a simple text editor.
    2. Recompile edited XML into DCP files
    3. Remove "Hue twists" from camera profiles. 
    For more information on hue twists, see these posts:
    11

    View comments

  8. Many cameras embed lens corrections into raw the raw files that they produce. Generally, that's a good thing - straight lines stay straight, etc. For an example of lens corrections in practice, take a look at this post about the Leica SL.

    But, as the saying goes, "there is no free lunch". Lens corrections also have some downsides:

    • Lens corrections result in a small reduction in sharpness. Sean Reid, at Reid Reviews has done extensive testing on this as part of his various lens reviews, and his conclusions are clear - there is a measurable loss in sharpness.
    • Lens corrections result in some reduction in image size - the corrections inevitably result in the edges of the image curving, and the curved parts need to be trimmed off to get back to a straight edge.
    So sometimes, it's useful to be able to get an uncorrected image. Now there are some raw developer apps that allow you get to uncorrected images (AccuRaw EXR is one of them), but most mainstream apps such as Lightroom and Photoshop don't allow correction to be disabled.

    Fortunately though, there is a "simple trick" that will allow you to disable lens corrections for nearly any camera that produces raw images. What you need to do is a simple two step process:
    1. Firstly, convert the raw image to a DNG image, using Adobe's DNG converter.
    2. Then use DNG Cleaner (macOS only) to remove any opcodes.
    The resulting DNG will not have any lens correction, and you can load it into Lightroom, Photoshop, or any other app that supports DNGs.

    Why does this work? This works because whenever DNG Converter converts an image that needs lens correction, it embeds the required correction as an "opcode" into the DNG image. Lens correction opcodes as usually things like "WarpRectilinear". DNG Cleaner knows where to find these opcodes, and simply removes them, as long as you have the "Remove opcodes" checkbox selected:


    Note that in order for this to work, you need DNG converter to be using it's default settings. Specifically, Compatibility should be set to the most recent version of Camera Raw. You should definitely not be using Custom Settings with the "Linear" checkbox selected. "Linear", otherwise known as LinearRaw, bakes any corrections into the actual data in the DNG, making it impossible to remove.

    There's more information on the DNG Cleaner website.
    0

    Add a comment

  9. Those of you that have read the Leica M10 raw file analysis post will know that M10 DNGs have more baggage in them that is typically the case for a Leica DNG. I've put together a little app to clean them up, called DNG Cleaner (Mac only for the moment). For M10 DNGs this will remove:

    1. The full size image preview - that will save about 3MB
    2. The various Lightroom/Photoshop adjustments embedded in the XMP portion of the DNG - ISO dependent noise reduction settings, lens profiles, etc

    DNG cleaner will also optionally remove opcodes, and apply lossless compression. This isn't relevant to the M10, but in many other Leica cameras, e.g., the Q, the SL, etc, opcodes are used for lens correction. For an example of the SL's with and without lens correction, see my post on the subject. DNG Cleaner is what Sean Reid used to remove opcodes for his SL 50 review, which some of you will have seen.

    As ever, back up your files before using any app that is designed to modify them.

    For more information on DNG Cleaner, see the website.
    0

    Add a comment

  10. AccuRaw users might have gotten a bit of a surprise recently - AccuRaw has turned into AccuRaw EXR, and is now at version 3.

    The reason for the name change is that the focus of the AccuRaw product has changed a bit, based on what users were actually doing with it. AccuRaw has always been focussed on having highly linear color response, with no "hue twists" or other surprises in the color rendering. As it turns out, that is a very useful feature to have if you're composting stills into video - it reduces the amount of work required for color matching.

    In the world of video, especially in the professional cinematography world, the "gold standard" is to use a format such as EXR, which is a floating point format. That allows huge flexibility in the way that post processing is done. So the new version of AccuRaw, now named AccuRaw EXR, supports EXR output.

    However, it's more than just a name change. In order to really support EXR output, AccuRaw has seen major changes internally - it now has a fully floating point, non-clipping workflow. For more on why that is important, see this post.

    1

    View comments

Popular Posts
Blog Archive
About Me
About Me
My Photo
Author of AccuRaw, PhotoRaw, CornerFix, pcdMagic, pcdtojpeg, dcpTool, WinDat Opener and occasional photographer....
Loading